ISSN (0970-2083)

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE SOLID WASTE IN CHITTAGONG CITY

Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar and MD. Simul Bhuyan* 

Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

*Corresponding Author:
Simul Bhuyan
Institute of Marine Sciences and Fisheries
University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
E-mail: simulbhuyan@gmail.com

Received date: 19 February, 2018; Accepted date: 25 June, 2018

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Industrial Pollution Control

Abstract

The present study was carried out to determine the physical and chemical composition of the Chittagong city. Fine organic materials comprises the major part of the produced solid waste (35.1%), while fine dust and vegetable matter constitute 28.5% and 20.6% respectively. The major components of municipal waste include food waste, glass, metals, can, debris, bricks, boards, leaves, paper, dirt and ashes, chemical composition found in the solid wastes showed high moisture content, high ash and inorganic contents and comparatively low nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content represent the important ingredients value for fertilizer of the waste and potential conversion of the waste into good compost. The leachate characteristics showed acidic in nature. It is also rich in nitrate and phosphate, whenever this highly polluted leachate got entrapped in ponds with the surface wash, it poses a high degree of pollution threat to ground water as well as surface water and subsequently health hazard.

Keywords

Composition, Solid waste, Leachate, Fertilizer, Chittagong city.

Introduction

Solid waste is the garbage, refuse, sludge and other discarded materials including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material, resulting from industrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations, and from community activities (Peavy, et al., 1985; Kumar, et al., 2016). Huge amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) (UN, 2003) is producing day by day since the generation rate is increasing even faster than the rate of urbanization (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012). The intensification of solid waste production within 10 years from 0.68 billion tons per year in 2000 to 1.3 billion tons per year in 2010 (Islam, 2016). It is anticipated to reach 2.2 billion tons per year by 2025 and 4.2 billion tons per year by 2050 (Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata, 2012).

Municipal solid waste is a global concern (Adeolu, et al., 2011) in developing countries though industrially advanced countries produce large quantities of wastes (Sujauddin, et al., 2008; Tchobanoglous and Theisen, 1977). Developing countries generate less solid waste because of lower purchasing power and the consequent lesser consumption (Cairncross and Feachem, 1993). Some factors such as poverty, population growth and high urbanization rates affect the efficient wastes management of developing countries (Cunningham, et al., 2005; Zurbrugg, 2003; Sridhar and Ojediran, 1983; Cointreau, 1982; Doan, 1998; El-Salam and Abu-Zuid, 2015).

Bangladesh being a developing country facing serious problem with solid waste. Incredible production of solid waste have been noticed due to fast population growth and ongoing economic development (Bhuiyan, 2010; Ahsan, et al., 2014; Afroz, et al., 2011). Moreover, Bangladesh, is a densely populated country that is experiencing with rapid urbanization and a huge number of rural people are migrating to urban areas each year (Salequzzaman, 2000; Enayetullah, et al., 2005). As a result, unplanned rapid urbanization and slum development icreased, and these areas produce a lot of incontrollable amounts of solid waste in all major cities (Dhaka, Chittagong, Rajshahi, Khulna, Sylhet and Barisal) of Bangladesh (Salequzzaman, et al., 2001).

Tremendous waste generated rapidly and creating lots of problems in Bangladesh (Bhuiyan, 2010). If these solid waste not managed properly, these will certainly have a negative impact on sustainable living style, local environment, and human health (Scarlat, et al., 2015; Enayetullah, et al., 2005; Hasan and Chowdhury, 2005). Severe negative consequences were reported in a number of cities of different countries like China (Cheng and Hu, 2010), India (Singh, et al., 2011), Malaysia (Johari, et al., 2012), and Thailand (Chiemchaisri and Visvanathan, 2008). Poor solid waste management has become a challenge for governments of developing countries in Asia and Africa (Calo and Parise, 2009; Halla, and Majani, 2003; Mwangi, 2000; Ogu, 2000; Zia, and Devadas, 2008; Zurrugg, 2002). Solid Waste is humiliating the urban environment and posing a serious threat to the natural resources and consequently impeding equitable sustainable development (Kumar and Bhowmick, 1998). 16,380 tons of waste are being produced in Bangladesh per day (Anonymous, 2004). Approximately 4500 tons of waste produced in Dhaka per day (Hasan and Chowdhury, 2005) even though Dhaka City Corporation (DCC) can collect and dispose only 42% of the solid waste (Salequzzaman, et al., 1998).

A significant amount of research work has been conducted on solid waste management in Bangladesh (Salequzzaman, et al., 1998; Salequzzaman, et al., 2001; Salequzzaman, 2000; Ahmed and Rahman, 2000; Alam, et al., 2002; Hasan and Chowdhury, 2005; Enayetullah, et al., 2005; Rahman, et al., 2006; Sinha, 2006). For sustainable management of these waste it is very important to know the physical and chemical composition of the waste. The present study was carried out to determine the Physical and Chemical Composition of the Solid Waste in Chittagong City.

Materials and Methods

Study site

The present study was carried out for a period of 12 months from January 2000 to December 2000 in Halishahar Munir Nagar Area, Chittagong Metropolitan City, Bangladesh (Fig. 1).

icontrolpollution-study-area

Fig 1 : Map of the study area (Map created by ArcGIS v.10.3).

Sample collection

Sample was collected from dumpsite area. Physical composition is tested by taking waste sample. Chemical composition is tested by taking soil sample from dumpsite area. The soil is the end product of solid waste which is dumped before. Leachate characteristics are tested by taking leachate from the drain near the dumpsite of selected area.

Sample analysis

Physical composition is separated by hand into recyclable, compostable and the residue just after being collection. The value of Hydrogen-ion- Concentration (pH) of water was determined by using pH paper (color pH indicators strips, Cat.9585, made in Germany). To determine the Dissolve Oxygen (DO) the collected samples in BOD bottles were fixed inside according to Azide Modification of (Winkler, 1988) and analysis were made by the same method. Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) were analyzed by the method stated by (APHA, 2005). Chloride measured by Volhard Method, Organic Matter (OM) was measured by Walkey and Black wet oxidation. Ion Chromatography was used to measure phosphates and nitrate (APHA, 1999). Moisture content was determined following the method stated by (Baba, et al., 2014). Suspended Solid was measured by following the method of (Shahi, 2009).

Results and Discussion

The present study was conducted to know the physical and chemical composition of the solid waste. The rate of waste generation is an index of socio-economic growth and financial affluence of the region. Growing development and rising incomes lead to greater usage of resources and waste composition is influenced by factors such as extent of urbanization, standard of living and climate (Solomon, 2011; Endalu and Habtom, 2014; Mengie, et al., 2015; Mohammed, 2015). The major components of Chittagong City wastes are various in natures which includes fine dust (28.5%), vegetable matters (20.6%), stone, bricks & earthward (8.4%), rags (4.2%), paper (1.8%), leather (0.6%), metals (0.8%) and fine organic matters (35.1%) (Table 1).

Constituents Percentage
Fine dust 28.5%
Vegetable matter 20.6%
Stone, bricks & earthward 8.4%
Rags 4.2%
Paper 1.8%
Leather 0.6%
Metals 0.8%
Fine organic 35.1%

Table 1: Physical composition of mixed municipal waste of Chittagong City.

Fine organic materials constitute the major portion of the generated solid waste (35.1%), whereas fine dust and vegetable matter constitute 28.5% and 20.6% respectively.

The solid waste was found to consist of glass (9.59%), metal (2.74%), paper (25.83%), plastics (3.87%), compostable organic matter (57.48%), WEEE (0.22%) and other waste (0.27%) (Yusuff, et al., 2014). (Titien, et al., 2013) reported that domestic solid waste generally comprises of a minimum of 75% organic matter. The composition of the households by weight were food (59.5%); ash and dust (25.08%); yard waste (11.6%); plastics and rubber (2.04%); paper and cardboard (1.12%); while textile, wood, glass and metals accounted only 0.1%, 0.16%, 0.2% and 0.2% wastes, respectively (Goa and Sota, 2017).

Chemical composition found in waste, generated in Chittagong City are moisture content, fixed residue, organic carbon, organic nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (Table 2).

Constituents Refuse from
Disposal Site
(%)
Domestic
Waste
(%)
Market Waste
(%)
Mixed
Refuse
(%)
Moisture Content 42-54 44.3 57.6 91.21
Fixed Residue 50-58.2 55.4 53.3 87.13
Organic Carbon Nil 24.5 27.6 20.83
Organic Nitrogen 0.4-0.7 0.43 0.34 0.39
Phosphorus 0.0-0.06 0.08 Nil 0.03
Potassium Nil Nil Nil Nil

Table 2: Chemical composition of waste generated in Chittagong City.

Organic nitrogen content in solid waste of Chittagong City is high, organic carbon and phosphorus content is also in considerable amount. Typical component values and composition of solid waste presented in Table 3.

Component Moisture (%) Typical Density (kg/m3) Typical C H O N S Ash
Glass 2 195 - - - - - -
Metal 3 320 - - - - - -
Paper 6 85 43.5 6.0 44.0 0.3 0.2 6.0
Plastics 2 65 60.0         10.0
Compostable 25 240 48.5 7.2 22.8 - - 5.0
(Organic) 10 65 55.0     2.2 0.3 2.5
UMW 20 240 49.5 6.5 37.5 4.6 0.1 1.5
a) Textile   8   480   26.3       5 68.0
b) Wood 6.6 31.2 0.2 0.1 --
c) Rubble 6.0 42.7 0.5 0.2 --
3.0 2.0 -- -- --

Table 3: Typical component values and composition of solid waste.

(Gidarakos, et al., 2005) found moisture content 2.93% in plastics and 17.11% in papers of solid waste in the island of Crete. The physical components were determined: organic materials (73.7%), plastics/ polythene (12.9%), cans/metals (4.3%), bottles/ glasses (4.2%), clothes/shoes (4.3%), and ceramics (0.6%) (John, et al., 2006). The mean concentration of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), sulfur (S), organic components contents were 11.0, 3.2, 10.7, 87.7, 18.4, 2.3 and 223.7 g-kg−1, respectively (John, et al., 2006). Rahman, et al., 2006) recorded average waste density, moisture content, organic matter, C: N 117 kg-m-3 (ranging from 136.23-95.36 kg-m-3 among the sub sources), 0 (34.13-25.38%), 9.57% (43.03-35.75%) and 17 (20.37- 15.08), respectively in the solid wastes of Chittagong Metropolitan Area.

The result of leachate test revealed the presence of suspended solid, chloride, phosphate and nitrate (Table 4).

Parameter Typical Range
pH 4.73 4.4-6.20
Suspended Solid (mg/L) 10 000 3,000-1,400
BOD (mg/L) 8 500 6,000-15,000
COD (mg/L) 13 000 5,000-18,000
Chloride (mg/L) 1 400 1,200-4,500
Phosphate (mg/L) 6 0-17
Nitrate (mg/L) 48 0-200

Table 4: Characteristic quality of leachate of Chittagong City.

BOD and COD are too high in the leachate of solid waste of Chittagong City. (Al-Wabel, et al., 2011) recorded pH (6.21), COD (17,003 mg/L), Cl- (8971.5 mg/L), NO-3 (not detected) and TSS (5604 mg/L) in municipal solid waste in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. In the present study, the COD concentrations was found 13,000 mg/L while total suspended solids recorded 10000 mg/L. Physical and chemical analyses of leachate samples collected from sanitary landfills in Alexandria, Egypt shown in Table 5.

Parameters
n = 6
Unit Min Leachate samples Max x ± SD
pH - 7.0 7.8 -
Chlorides mg/l 9500 16,250 11387 ± 119
Total suspended solids mg/l 3278 14,464 12985 ± 137
Chemical oxygen demand mg/l 12,850 16,350 15629 ± 206
Biochemical oxygen demand mg/l 9620 11,700 10824 ± 95
Total nitrogen mg/l 382 954 583 ± 76
Nitrate-N mg/l 0.36 2.9 1.4 ± 0.2
Phosphates mg/l 0.29 0.52 0.37 ± 0.04

Table 5: Bacterial biochemical tests on the Qua-Iboe River water sample

These values were extremely higher than the respective values detected by (Chu, et al., 1994; Al- Yaqout and Hamoda, 2003). The amount of chloride was recoded 1400 mg/L lower than (Al-Wabel, et al., 2011) (5503–11,538 mg/L). The pH values of the leachates were found 4.73 lower than the (Al- Wabel, et al., 2011). This indicate the acidic nature of leachates as well as the organic and inorganic acids formed during the decay of the municipal wastes.

Conclusion

From the findings of the present study it could be concluded that, except pH and chloride, most of the values as well as the concentrations of parameters were so much higher in the solid waste and leachates in Chittagong City when comparing with some other results. It is urgent to know the physical and chemical composition of the solid waste for sustainable management. Because of improper planning, governmental policy, and administrative and managerial problems, the municipal waste management situation in Chittagong, has become appalling. The irresponsible behaviour of the city dwellers and the commercial units within the residential areas make the situation worse. Furthermore, the city governments failed to educate and motivate the city inhabitants to participate in the waste management programmes. The technology that may be applied to solid waste management in this respect, these include using such litters as a source of raw materials for industrial sector, a source for energy production, as a conditioners in soil development and organic farming.

References

  1. Adeolu, O.A., Ada, V.O., Gbenga, A.A. and Adebayo A.O. (2011). Assessment of groundwater contamination by leachate near a municipal solid waste landfill. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 5 : 933-940.
  2. Afroz, R., Hanaki, K. and Tudin, R. (2011). Factors affecting waste generation: a study in a waste management program in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 179 : 509-519.
  3. Ahsan, A., Alamgir, M., El-Sergany, M.M., Shams, S., Rowshon, M.K. and Daud, N.N. (2014). Assessment of municipal solid waste management system in a developing country. Chinese Journal of Engineering. 2014 : 11.
  4. Al-Yaqout, A.F. and Hamoda, M.F. (2003). Evaluation of landfill leachate in arid climate-a case study, Kuwait. Environ. Int. 29 : 593-600.
  5. Al-Wabel, M.I., Al Yehya, W.S., AL-Farraj, A.S. and El-Maghraby, S.E. (2011). Characteristics of landfill leachates and bio-solids of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 10 : 65-70.
  6. APHA (American Public Health Association). (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 21st edn American Public Health Association (APHA). Washington DC: Port City Press, USA.
  7. APHA (American Public Health Association). (1999). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 733.
  8. Baba, M.T., Abubakar, A. and Abdurrahman, M.B. (2014). Estimation of moisture content of household solid waste in some selected areas of Jimeta Town. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 5 : 430-433.
  9. Bhuiyan, S.H. (2010). A crisis in governance: Urban solid waste management in Bangladesh. Habitat International. 34 : 125-133.
  10. Calo, F. and Parise, M. (2009). Waste management and problems of groundwater pollution in karst environments in the context of a post-conflict scenario: The case of Mostar (Bosnia Herzegovina). Habitat International. 33 : 63-72.
  11. Cairncross, S. and Feachem, R.G. (1993). Environmental health engineering in the tropics: An introductory text, (second edn). John Wiley & sons, NY, UK.
  12. Cheng, H. and  Hu, Y. (2010). Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China. Bioresource Technology. 101 : 3816-3824.
  13. Chiemchaisri, C. and Visvanathan, C. (2008). Greenhouse gas emission potential of the municipal solid waste disposal sites in Thailand. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. 58 : 629-635.
  14. Chu, L.M., Cheung, K.C. and Wong, M.H. (1994). Variations in the chemical properties of landfill leachate. Environ. Manage. 18 : 105-117.
  15. Cointreau, S.J. (1982). Environmental management of urban solid wastes in developing countries: A project guide, Urban Development Dept, World Bank,
  16. Cunningham, W.P., Cunningham, M.T. and Saigo, B.W. (2005). Environmental Science: A global concern, (8th Edition), McGraw-Hill NY, USA. p. 67-95.
  17. Doan, P.L. (1998). Institutionalizing household waste collection: the urban environmental management project in Cote d’Ivoire. Habitat International. 22 : 27-39.
  18. El-Salam, M.M.A. and Abu-Zuid, G.I. (2015). Impact of landfill leachate on the groundwater quality: A case study in Egypt. Journal of Advanced Research. 6 : 579-586.
  19. Enayetullah, I., Sinha, A.H.M.M. and Khan, S.S.A. (2005). Urban solid waste management scenario of Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. Waste Concern Technical Documentation, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 18.
  20. Endalu, L. and Habtom, T. (2014). Characterization and disposal of municipal solid waste, case study. Hosanna town. American Journal of Environmental Engineering. 4 : 162-168.
  21. Gidarakos, E., Havas, G. and Ntzamilis, P. (2005). Municipal solid waste composition determination supporting the integrated solid waste management system in the island of Crete. Waste Management. 30.
  22. Goa, E. and Sota, S.S. (2017). Generation rate and physical composition of solid waste in Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies & Management. 10 : 415- 426.
  23. Hasan, G.M.J. and Chowdhury, M.A.I. (2005). Municipal waste management and environmental hazards in Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 8 : 921-928.
  24. Halla, F. and Majani, B. (2003). Innovative ways for solid waste management in Dar-Es- Salaam: toward stakeholder partnerships. Habitat International. 23 : 351-361.
  25. Hoornweg, D. and Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management, World Bank.
  26. John, N.M., Edem, S. O., Ndaeyo, N.U. and Ndon, B.A. (2006). Physical composition of municipal solid waste and nutrient contents of its organic component in Uyo Municipality, Nigeria. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 29 : 189-194.
  27. Johari, A., Ahmed, S.I., Hashim, H., Alkali, H. and Ramli, M. (2012). Economic and environmental benefits of landfill gas from municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 : 2907-2912.
  28. Kumar, P.D. and Bhowmick, G.C. (1998). Solid waste management – The obvious answer. In: Roy, D. (Ed.), Environment Management with Indian Experience. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi. 173.
  29. Kumar, S., Dhar, H., Vijay, V.N., Bhattacharyya, J.K., Vaidya, A.N. and Akolkar, A.B. (2016). Characterization of municipal solid waste in high-altitude sub-tropical regions. Environmental Technology. 37 : 2627-2637.
  30. Mengie, B., Venkateswarlu, M. and GopalaKrishna, V.B. (2015). Solid waste generation and solid waste disposal site Management in urban areas: the case of Dessie town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Scientific and Technical Research. 3 : 293-307.
  31. Mohammed, G. (2015). Assessing the current status of solid waste management of Gondar town, Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 4 : 28-36.
  32. Mwangi, S.W. (2000). Partnerships in urban environmental management: an approach to solving environmental problems in Nakuru, Kenya. Environment and Urbanization. 12 : 77-92.
  33. Ogu, V.I. (2000). Private sector participation and municipal waste management in Benin city, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization. 12 : 103-117.
  34. Peavy, H.S. (1985). Donald Rowe and George Tchobanoglous. Environmental Engineering McGraw-Hill Company, USA. p. 326-560.
  35. Rahman, M.A., Alam, M.S. and Al-Amin, M. (2006). Segregation of biodegradable solid waste of Chittagong metropolitan area based on specific physical and chemical properties. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 9 : 460-464.
  36. Salequzzaman, M., Murtaza, M.G. and Saroar, M. (1998). Evaluation Study on Municipal Solid Waste Management Project in Khulna City, PRODIPAN, Shaheb Bari Road, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh.
  37. Salequzzaman, M. (2000). Perceptions of vehicle air pollution in Khulna, Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the Habitus 2000, Conference in Perth. Western Australia.
  38. Salequzzaman, M., Awal, M. and Alam, M. (2001). Willingness to pay: community based solid waste management and its sustainability in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the International Conference ‘The Future is Here’, RMIT, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  39. Scarlat, N., Motola, V., Dallemand, J.F., Monforti-Ferrario, F. and Mofor, L. (2015). Evaluation of energy potential of municipal solid Waste from African urban areas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 50 : 1269-1286.
  40. Shahi, N.K. (2009). Solids in Wastewater. 18. https://www.academia.edu/2453866/Solid_Waste_in_Wastewater.
  41. Sinha, A.H.M.M. (2006). Community based solid waste management through public-private community partnerships: Experience of waste concern in Bangladesh. Paper presented in 3R South Asia Expert Workshop, Katmandu, Nepal.
  42. Singh, R.P., Tyagi, V.V., T. Allen, Ibrahim, M.H. and Kothari, R. (2011). An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15 : 4797-4808.
  43. Solomon, C. (2011). Assessment of municipal solid waste management service in Dessie town. MSc thesis, School of Graduate Studies, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
  44. Sridhar, M.K.C. and Ojediran, O. (1983). The problems and prospects of refuse in Ibadan city, Nigeria. Senate Committee on Environment and Ecology, Solid Waste Management in the 21st century Nigeria. 1-8.
  45. Sujauddin, M., Huda, S.M.S. and Hoque, A.T.M.R. (2008). Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Waste Management. 28 : 1688-1695.
  46. Tchobanoglous, G.H. and Theisen, E.R. (1977). Solid wastes: Engineering principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  47. Titien, S.R., Rachmansyah, S.A. and Muhaiman, A.W. (2013). Composition on characteristic of solid waste: A case study at landfill, Mojokerto, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. 3 : 1-7.
  48. UN. (2003). Cities and sustainable development: Lessons and experiences from Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
  49. Winkler, L.W. (1988). The determination of dissolved oxygen in Water. Berlin. Deut. Chem. yeas. 133.
  50. Yusuff, A.S., John, W., Okoro, O. and Ajibade, A. (2014). Physico-chemical composition and energy content analysis of solid waste: A case study of Castlereagh District, Northern Ireland. American Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Research. 2 : 1-9.
  51. Zia, H. and Devadas, V. (2008). Urban solid waste management in Kanpur: Opportunities and perspectives. Habitat International.  32: 58-73.
  52. Zurrugg, C. (2002). Urban solid waste management in low-income countries of Asia, how to cope with the garbage crisis, scientific committee on problems of the environment (SCOPE), Durban South Africa. p. 1-13.

Copyright © 2024 Research and Reviews, All Rights Reserved